<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
<title>CSS Styling Attributes Disposition of Comments for 21 January 2010 LCWD</title>
<style type="text/css">
.a { background:lightgreen }
.r { background:orange }
.fo { background:red }
.oi { background: yellow }
</style>

<h1>CSS Styling Attributes Disposition of Comments</h1>

<p>Last call document:<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-css-style-attr-20100121/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-css-style-attr-20100121/</a>

<p>Editor's draft: <a href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-style-attr/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-style-attr/</a>

<p>The following color coding convention is used for comments:</p>

<ul>
 <li class="a">Accepted or Rejected/OutOfScope/Invalid + verified
 <li class="r">Rejected and not verified
 <li class="oi">Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
 <li class="fo">Formal Objection (There were no formal objections.)
</ul>

<p>An issue can be closed as <code>Accepted</code>, <code>OutOfScope</code>,
<code>Invalid</code>, <code>Rejected</code>, or <code>Retracted</code>.
<code>Verified</code> indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.</p>

<pre class="a" id="issue-1">
Issue 1.
Summary:  Use term "inline style" somewhere to be consistent with HTML 4
From:     Ingo Chao
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0507.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0507.html</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0187.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0187.html</a>
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0196.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0196.html</a>
</pre>
<pre class="a" id="issue-2">
Issue 2.
Summary:  Specify inline styles' specificity
From:     Ingo Chao
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0508.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0508.html</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0188.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0188.html</a>
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0197.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0197.html</a>
</pre>
<pre class="a" id="issue-3">
Issue 3.
Summary:  Unclear that comment token convention is normative
From:     SVGWG
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #2">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #2</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html</a>
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html</a>
</pre>
<pre class="a" id="issue-4">
Issue 4.
Summary:  Unclear that delimiting braces are excluded from style attribute syntax
From:     SVGWG
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #4">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #4</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html</a>
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0473.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0473.html</a>
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0493.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0493.html</a>
</pre>
<pre class="a" id="issue-5">
Issue 5.
Summary:  CSS2.1 parsing rules exclude CSS3 properties
From:     SVGWG
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #6">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #6</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html</a>
Closed:   OutOfScope // CSS2.1
Verified: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html</a>
</pre>
<pre class="a" id="issue-6">
Issue 6.
Summary:  CSS2.1 parsing rules exclude SVG properties
From:     SVGWG
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #7">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #7</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html</a>
Closed:   Invalid // or OutOfScope -> CSS2.1?
Verified: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html</a>
</pre>
<pre class="a" id="issue-7">
Issue 7.
Summary:  Allow scientific notation in CSS properties
From:     SVGWG
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0473.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0473.html</a>
Closed:   OutOfScope
Verified: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0493.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0493.html</a>
</pre>
